FRM-Hypothesis testing

anbu.edu
Finance Junkie
Posts: 205
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2013 3:35 pm

FRM-Hypothesis testing

Postby anbu.edu » Thu Mar 14, 2013 4:13 pm

A goal of an “innocent until proven guilty” justice system is to place a higher priority on:

A) avoiding type II errors.
B) avoiding type III errors.
C) avoiding type I errors.
D) the null hypothesis.

Is it (D) or (C) which one is more accurate and why

content.pristine
Finance Junkie
Posts: 356
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2012 11:26 am

FRM-Hypothesis testing

Postby content.pristine » Thu Mar 14, 2013 7:25 pm

The answer here is A.
The judicial system would rather let a guilty guy free, than arrest an innocent.
Taking an innocent man to jail is a type II error.


Return to “FRM Part I”



Disclaimer

Global Association of Risk Professionals, Inc. (GARP®) does not endorse, promote, review or warrant the accuracy of the products or services offered by EduPristine for FRM® related information, nor does it endorse any pass rates claimed by the provider. Further, GARP® is not responsible for any fees or costs paid by the user to EduPristine nor is GARP® responsible for any fees or costs of any person or entity providing any services to EduPristine Study Program. FRM®, GARP® and Global Association of Risk Professionals®, are trademarks owned by the Global Association of Risk Professionals, Inc

CFA Institute does not endorse, promote, or warrant the accuracy or quality of the products or services offered by EduPristine. CFA Institute, CFA®, Claritas® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.

Utmost care has been taken to ensure that there is no copyright violation or infringement in any of our content. Still, in case you feel that there is any copyright violation of any kind please send a mail to abuse@edupristine.com and we will rectify it.